Friday, 31 May 2013

AKHBAR-AKHBAR UMNO GAM SAHAJA BERITA ANWAR KECUALI LIWAT

COMMENT:  GOOD OR BAD PUBLICITY IS STILL PUBLICITY- li dosh.

Anwar Ibrahim





Telah sekian lama akhbar-akhbar harian arus perdana menyiarkan berbagai aksi politik Anwar Ibrahim  yang bersifat provokasi, pementasan, pembohongan yang menyebabkannya diingati setiap hari, popular dan lebih penting dari dirinya yang sebenar.

Soal sama ada berita-berita ini memberikan kesan negatif atau positif adalah terletak kepada penerimaan  di pihak mana seseorang itu berdiri. Kebanyakan akhbar harian perdana menyiarkan berita dan rencana yang mengecamnya. Keputusan PRU 13 memberikan jawapannya.

Bagaimanapun apa yang sudah pasti ialah publisiti buruk atau baik telah menjadikannya sebagai seorang yang relevan kepada seluruh rakyat. Akhbar akhbar perdana Bahasa Malaysia dan juga TV3 tidak dapat menghakiskan keyakinan golongan yang fanatik kepadanya sebalikhya hanya meyakinkan lagi orang yang sudahpun yakin kepada BN.

Stratiji Anwar  untuk menjadikan pembohongan setiap hari sebagai gospel truth telah hampir berjaya kerana ada akhbar-akhbar Cina dan juga The Star menyiarkan sebagai berita benar mengenai dakwaannya mengatakan blackout, peti undi hilang, kiraan undi awal, kehadiran pengundi asing dan sebagainya.

Ketua Bahagian Perang Saraf Pertama Malaya/Malaysia (1956-1986) mendiang Tan Sri  Dr. C.C.Too  dalam temubual eksklusif dengan Jabatan Penerangan Malaysia pada 17 Mei 1986 memberitahu bahawa dia sangat gembira apabila ruangan pembaca akhbar bulanan perang saraf yang diterbitkannya New Path News telah dikecam oleh penyokong-penyokong komunis sebagai “akhbar  anjing.”

Semakin banyak cercaan, semakin menggembirakannya kerana beliau dapat memberikan jawapan yang lebih meyakinkan musuh.

Akhbar-akhbar arus perdana yang dikuasai oleh UMNO seharusnya memikirkan apakah wajar memberikan publisiti kepada aktiviti binatang politik ini. Lebih baik blackout atau gam sahaja sebarang cerita mengenainya. Seperti kata Tun Daim bekas Menteri Kewangan "Lets leave this clown's strategis and not play to his game."

Berita mengenai  perbicaraan liwatnya kelak bolehlah diberikan siaran besar-besaran.

Tidaklah sewajarnya berita mengenai seorang yang tidak dikehendaki oleh majoriti masyarakat peribumi  diberikan tempat yang begitu besar setiap hari dalam akhbar-akhbar perdana sehingga dia merasa dirinya lebih besar dari biasa, sedangkan partinya hanya mewakili 30 kawasan Parlimen dan UMNO mewakili 88 kerusi Parlimen yang didokong sepenuhnya oleh bumiputera.

Kita mesti  menjadikannya tidak relevan. Bagaimanapun treatment  gam  berita mengenainya bolehlah difikirkan oleh pengarang, tetapi melimpahkan berita kecaman terhadapnya  hampir di setiap muka, adalah sangat tidak wajar,tidak mendatangkan kesan positif malah menjemukan pembaca.

Kalau akhbar-akhbar Cina dan The Star mahu menjadikannya terus penting dan relevan untuk kepentingan masyarakat Cina, maka itu adalah hak mereka.

SIAPAPUN BOLEH REKA CERITA INI

COMMENT:
PKR  TO KEEP LODGING REPORT FOR SIMILAR ISSUES
By : li dosh
I think the PR strategies especially PKR is to keep lodging heaps and heaps of police reports for similar issues. Someone prepared the templates. Later these would be used by them as evidence that the POLIS are useless in their investigation.
 Its not that far away to think they will issue statement through Bersih with things like Polis act only on less than 5% of the report lodged. Sounds familiar with Bersih comment in Asia Times like ' Bersih does not recognize the legitimacy of current minority government. Sounds hebat..

I think for the rakyat we have to wait for our turn in case we have buglary, accident, death to report and give way for selfish faction in PR to play their games with the enforcement authority. Their games supercede everything else and that is the harsh reality when LGE declared Malaysia is entering a dark harsh, oppresive, militaristic aka Myanmar rule age in recent wesak's greeting. So much for religious festivity greeting.
With that said, should anyone want to hitch a ride to the police station, in need of transport, dont call the cab, call PKR members. They might be on the way there already..Call now.
SIAPAPUN BOLEH REKA CERITA INI
Ada orang yang akan terus percaya berita ini tanpa berfikir dua kali. Berita ini disiarkan tersembunyi dalam para di bawah berita bertajuk: PKR vows to go on with rallies until  concerns are addressed di akhbar The Star hari ini (30 Mei).

Dalam para ke tujuh disebutkan: Meanwhile PKR director of strategies Rafizi Ramli claimed that there was an incident on polling day in Perak where a ballot box went missing for two hours, requiring the ballots in it to be eventually cancelled.

Untuk menyakinkan orang ramai terhadap pembohongannya, Rafizi menunjukkan laporan polis oleh seorang agen PKR tentang kejadian ini.

Rafizi juga menunjukkan satu laporan polis yang dibuat oleh Abu HussinTamby agen bagi calon PKR yang kalah di kawasan negeri Ayer Limau Melaka yang mendakwa melihat agen EC mengira lebih dahulu "undi pengundi awal" pada 30 April walaupun kiraan itu hanya boleh dilakukan pada hari pembuangan undi.

Tidakkah anda terfikir bahawa sesiapapun boleh membuat cerita-cerita rekaan seumpama ini dan untuk menyakinkan orang ramai, mereka membuat laporan  polis.

Mereka yang membuat laporan ini adalah pihak yang selalunya discredit polis, tetapi untuk membohongi orang ramai mereka membuat laporan kepada pihak yang mereka tidak percaya.

Soalnya kenapa The Star boleh menyiarkan berita yang hanya merupakan dakwaan suatu pihak semata-mata. Apakah ethic journalisme yang memerlukan penyiaran berita seimbang dengan penjelasan dari yang tertuduh tidak perlu lagi.?

PKR telah membuat cerita yang sama dalam soal blackout, kehilangan dakwat hitam dan pengundi asing dan berbagai-bagai lagi.

Suruhanjaya Pilihan Raya dan Polis mesti bertindak dalam bidang kuasa masing-masing terhadap laporan palsu yang bertujuan untuk menggunakan polis sebagai sandaran bagi mengesahkan pembohongan.

Mereka yang membuat laporan palsu mesti diajar dengan sewajarnya dengan pantas. Jika dibiarkan akan menggalakkan pelbagai lagi laporan palsu.

Thursday, 30 May 2013

CHINESE EVEN BRIBE THEIR GODS

 A response to : WHO IS THE BIGGEST GIVER OF BRIBE IN MALAYSIA? ( Posted 22 May
By Soh Chee Tham
The concept and practice of corruption can be clearly linked to culture and religious belief.  In general Malays, because of their religious belief, are quite adversed to corruption and Allah has promised a severe penalty.  

However, those Malay muslims who are weak in their faith (iman) easily succumb to corrupt practices in their quest for wealth to be at par with their Chinese counterparts.

The guilt is there and that is why this weak Malays will use a Chinese to offer bribes to another Malay.  Likewise a Malays will normally feel offended if offered bribes by another Malay, they rather receive it from a Chinese. 

In general the Chinese accepts corruption as a normal business practice.  It is part of their culture and there is no guilt in it.  Although there are exception, because some Chinese believe in good ethics, they are in minority.  Corruption is their way of life even in ancient China.  

We need to study their long history to understand this.  So when the Chinese migrate to Malaya they brought along their culture here.

Perhaps we can find out from the Chinese what is the concept behind Kuih Bakul. 

 When I was young I asked my Chinese neighbour about "kuih bakul"  It was explained to me that Kuih Bakul is actually an "offering" given to one of their Gods when this God visit them on that auspicious day. It is made very sweet & sticky so that it stick in the God's mouth who will then put up a good report about the offerer to the chief God. 

This is an interesting concept because they even bribe their Gods and so there is nothing wrong in giving bribes.  It is not just Kuih Bakul, the Chinese also offers roasted pig, chicken, and etc.  It is left at the altar for their Gods to take it.  The concept of bribery is thus part of Chinese culture.

Wednesday, 29 May 2013

ANWARINAS MINTA NIK AZIZ SEKAT USAHA BERBAIK PAS - UMNO

APABILA TERCIUM ADA USAHA MERAPATKAN  PAS DAN UMNO,HARAKAHDAILY YANG DIKUASAI OLEH ANWARINAS  SEGERA MENGINTERVIU MURSYIDUL AM PAS NIK AZIZ NIK MAT UNTUK  MENGINGATKAN MANA MANA PIHAK DALAM PAS SUPAYA BERHENTI DARI MENERUSKAN USAHA INI.

KATA NIK AZIZ "TIADA PERPADUAN  PAS - UMNO SELAGI SAYA HIDUP" 

SEKURANG-KURANGNYA KENYATAAN INI TELAH MENGAMANKAN PERASAAN ANWAR IBRAHIM YANG SEDANG DALAM KEBIMBANGAN KERANA PAS TIDAK MAHU MENYERTAINYA UNTUK MERAMPAS KUASA CARA KEKERASAN. 

Petikan dari Harakahdaily  29 Mei 2013

KUALA LUMPUR, 29 Mei —  Datuk Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat berkata selagi masih hidup, beliau tidak akan membenarkan sebarang usaha ke arah penyatuan PAS dan Umno.

Menurut Mursyidul Am PAS itu, parti adalah milik semua ahlinya dan sebarang tindakan atau keputusan yang dibuat perlu mendapat persetujuan daripada semua ahli terutamanya melalui muktamar.

“Saya tidak bagi, selagi saya masih hidup saya tidak akan benarkan usaha untuk menjalin kerjasama PAS dan Umno dilakukan,” kata bekas menteri besar Kelantan itu (gambar) dipetik dari portal Harakahdaily.

“Tidak boleh sesiapapun mengatur usaha untuk mengadakan kerjasama antara PAS dan Umno apa lagi secara senyap-senyap, parti ini terbuka kepada orang ramai dan milik ahli,” tambah beliau lagi.

Menurut Nik Aziz, Umno sejak awal lagi menolak dasar Islam sebagaimana yang diperjuangkan oleh PAS dan selain persoalan dasar parti, banyak lagi perkara yang perlu dikaji terhadap kesilapan Umno dalam perjuangan mereka.

“Untuk itu tidak ada sebab kita ingin bersama mereka dan saya peringatkan pada yang lain jangan ada usaha ini,” katanya.

Dalam Pilihan Raya 2013, PAS memenangi 21 kerusi Parlimen dan mengekalkan penguasaan terhadap negeri Kelantan. Bagaimanapun, PAS gagal untuk mempertahankan negeri Kedah yang mereka menangi pada 2008.

Sementara Umno meningkatkan penguasaan kerusi Parlimen mereka, 88 daripada 133 kerusi BN.

Tuesday, 28 May 2013

"I LOVE PM". IT IS DISGUSTING

NAJIB JADI LUAR BIASA
Masyarakat Cina telah  yang memukau Datuk Seri Najib 
dengan banner I Love PM
Dalam masa kempen PU 13, Perdana Menteri Datuk Seri Najib ditunjukan minum makan bersama rakyat di kedai-kedai lepak rakyat biasa di sana sini, di gerai, di cafe  di kedai mamak dan sebagainya. Penasihatnya berfikir bahawa gambar ini akan menunjukan Najib yang elitis dari keluarga bangsawan hidup seperti rakyat biasa tetapi kepada rakyat adalah "luar biasa" kerana tidak pernah mereka terserempak dengan Najib di tempat-tempat begini.

Lebih luar biasa apabila diiringi oleh pengawal dan pembantu peribadi. Nampaklah kepura-puraan.

Kata mantan Menteri Kewangan Daim Zainuddin,  Anwar Ibrahim adalah clown (lebih tepat dipanggil Raja Lawak). Kata saya Najib adalah imitator. Penasihatnya berkepala di awan tanpa kaki mencecah daratan. Inilah penasihat yang patut disingkirkan.

IT LOOKS AWFUL

Memang hal ini sudah lama terasa di hati, terfikir di kepala, tertusuk di mata tetapi tidak terkata.

Seorang kawan dalam dunia korporat mengirim pesanan ringkas menepati cita rasa zamkata:

Katanya, On Daim's remark I agree fully. Najib dosen't need to compete with Anwar and try to imitate his style. It looks awful. Please tell them to stop showig the banner "I Love PM" It is disgusting. Najib Should present himself as a serious statesman not as a student  leader style.

UMNO DALAM KEADAAN PANIK

Negara belum keluar dari keruncingan politik; keselamatan diancam oleh communist surrogate, tiap hari ada tunjuk perasaan cina baju  hitam cemarkan pilihan raya yang  sah, berbagai laporan palsu polis dibuat; blackout, dakwat padam, The Star dramatised berita light got out during black 505 rally in Tapah  selama 10 minit seolah-olah baru berlaku dan benar-benar berlaku, cuma atas dakwaan pembangkang tanpa pengesahan sesiapapun. Hebat sekali Journalisme The Star.

Blackout di kawasan sekolah di Sedim Kedah pada hari yang sama juga 10 minit. Semakin banyak laporan sama dibuat semakin ramai orang percaya. Ini strategi mereka.

Dalam keadaan menghadapi pelbagai cabaran dari raja lawak dan kepala cauvanisme Cina, tiba-tiba muncul pula cerita hendak jadikan BN sebagai satu parti tunggal pelbagai kaum dengan membubarkan semua parti komponen.

Sesuatu cadangan yang serius patut dikemukakan dalam keadaan tenang bukan dalam keadaan masih ribut. Tidakkah ini menunjukan pemimpin-pemimpin UMNO berada dalam keadaan panik.

Nak test the ground pun bukanlah masa sekarang ini.

SUARA PEMBANGKANG SEKEJAP HALAL SEKEJAP HARAM

Kedua-dua suara cetak parti pembangkang iaitu Harakah dan Suara Keadilan yang telah dibiarkan dijual kepada umum walaupun untuk hanya pengedaran kepada ahli sejak sebelum PU 2008 tiba-tiba diharamkan setelah PU13. Tindakan merampas jualannya telah dibuat.

Perkara ini lucu, pelek dan ajaib. Apakah ianya haram kerana sekarang KDN di bawah Zahid Hamidi dan halal kerana di bawah Hishamuddin Hussein sedangkan hukumannya memang haram. Atau ada  pegawai-pegawai KDN yang pro pembangkang yang memejamkan mata atau kerana sukar untuk mengawal.

Penjelasan perlu diberikan kepada rakyat supaya mereka tidak terkejut apabila dihalalkan semula jualannya kepada umum. Rupa-rupanya ada undang-undang kerajaan yang boleh sekejap halal sekejap haram.

Tindakan ini meyakinkan rakyat terhadap kecacatan demokrasi kerana telah sekian lama mereka bebas membeli yang haram.

Monday, 27 May 2013

MALAYSIA AND A NEW RELIGION

By Rosihan Lubis.

The name of this new religion is human rights.

When the United Nations Convention of Human Rights was adopted in 1948, nobody thought human rights would one day become a “religion”.

The Guardian of UK carried an article on this new religion by Anthony Julius (http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/apr/19/human-rights-new-secular-religion). Julius says: A human rights discourse now dominates politics; there is a powerful human rights "movement". It is the new secular religion of our time.

The power  of human rights is not confine to politics but intertwine with social life resulting in movements such as  gay and lesbian movements. These movements are not only to be found in the United States, but also in Europe, and elsewhere.
If we are no vigilant, Malaysia may soon be engulfed by these movements.

This new religion is causing havoc  in some western countries. France,  had voted  to legalise same sex marriage.   Some states in the United States have also legalised same sex marriage. There were streets protests opposing the law in France.

Although Malaysia does not ratify the UNCHR, we adopted the spirits of the convention by forming the Human Rights Commission.

What is more important though, we have been amending or even repealed some of our laws to conform to  demands of human rights groups, which needless to say, will facilitate the arrival of this new religion.
Watch out for certain political parties and NGOs with this agenda.








Saturday, 25 May 2013

JIKA TIDAK BERKESAN NAJIB AKAN DITELAN OLEH BLUE OCEAN

TUN DAIM: PENASIHAT-PENASIHAT NAJIB PATUT DISINGKIRKAN
(Bacalah di bawah ini interviu dengan bekas Menteri Kewangan petikan dari The Scribe A Kadir Jasin )

Perdana Menteri Datuk Seri Najib sedang membayar harga yang sangat mahal  terhadap langkahnya menghapuskan Akta Keselamatan Dalam Negeri yang dilakukannya untuk meyakinkan dunia terhadap demokrasi Malaysia.

Dalam negeri tindakannya itu semakin menghakiskan keyakinan rakyat terhadap kemampuan pihak berkuasa  untuk menjamin keselamatan dengan pantas dan berkesan.

Mantan Perdana Menteri Datuk Seri Dr. Mahathir tidak membayar harga bejuta ringgit kepada pakar-pakar luar negara untuk menyelamakan Malaysia dari krisis ekonomi. Dia membuktikan keyakinan terhadap diri sendiri dari pembedahan jantungnya hingga kepada pengurusan kesakitan negara.

Semalam silent majority dikejutkan dengan tindakan seorang majistret menolak permintaan polis untuk meneruskan tahanan reman terhadap tiga orang tahanan iaitu Naib Presiden PKR Tian Chua serta dua aktivis pro pembangkang Haris Tahillah Mohamed Ibrahim dan Tamrin Ghafar yang sedang disiasat di bawah Secton 4(1) Akta Hasutan 48 .

Menteri Dalam Negeri yang menyedari kekecewaan dan kemarahan rakyat terhadap keputusan majistret itu  segera membuat kenyataan bahawa polis akan membuat rayuan terhadap keputusannya.

Apapun ternyatalah dengan kehilangan ISA telah menimbulkan masalah besar kepada pihak keselamatan untuk bertindak mematahkan kemungkinan berlakunya bahaya yang lebih besar. Prevention is better than cure telah diketepikan..

Najib tidak memberikan perhatian terhadap sikap manusia yang sekalipun terdidik dan terlatih tetapi tetap mempunyai kelemahan masing-masing; bias, takut, sentimen dan tidak rasional. .

Strategi Blue Ocean yang dibanggakan oleh Najib untuk menyelesaikan semua masalah pengurusan negara termasuk jenayah dan poltik ternyatalah telah memakan dirinya. Beliau masih belum puleh dari kejutan Blue Ocean yang bertukar menjadi Chinese Tsunami pada 5 Mei.

Jika beliau masih terus membaca kejutan ini dengan kaca mata lama, masih terpukau dengan  nasihat orang- orang yang dianggapnya pakar maka Najib mesti bersedia untuk ditelan oleh Blue Ocean pada Perhimpunan Agung UMNO yang akan datang. Semoga beberapa orang profesional yang baru dilantiknya akan dapat membantunya melihat kekarutan pakar lama.

Mungkin kata-kata ini pahit tetapi mestilah dilihat dari sudut kejujuran dan keikhlasan.

Najib lebih bijak bercakap dari bapanya tetapi ternyata dia tidak sebijak dan setegas bapanya Tun Abdul Razak dalam melihat kelemahan manusia dan menangani negara dalam  menghadapi krisis.

PETIKAN DARI OutSyed The Box
Kalau Nakhoda Kuranglah Faham, And The Law Is An Ass
Here is some news from April 20, 2013.
  • Former ISA detainee freed
  • Yazid Sufaat charged with terrorist activities in Syria acquitted by High Court 
  • Judge Kamardin Hashim ordered Yazid and his friends to be freed 
  • court satisfied there was merit in the submission by the defence 
  • Security Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012 under Article 149 Federal Const.
  • Article 149  only applicable for acts of threats inside Malaysia.
  • "offences committed in Syria, Article 49 and SOSMA cannot be used 
  • abuse of the court process if the prosecution was allowed to go on.
  • Yazid charged with incit(ing) people of Syria to commit terrorist acts 
  • Halimah Hussein and Muhammad Hilmi Hasim charged with abetting him   
This is why the law is an ass, especially when it does not evolve with time. All over the world, countries are enacting new laws to tackle global terrorism. The United States has the Patriot Act. The UK has the Anti Terrorism Act. 

In Malaysia we have abolished the ISA.

Just because the BN performed poorly in the 2008 elections, the Gomen chickened out and abolished the ISA.  The net result is now we cannot convict people for terrorist activities simply because they plan terrorist acts to be carried out outside the country.  This is what you get when you abolish the ISA.  And in 2013 the Gomen performed even worse in the general elections. So abolish ISA pun tak guna. 

I honestly think it is time to bring our laws on par with the US Patriot Act or the UK's Anti Terrorism Act. What do you think? 

America and the UK are the beacons of democracy and human rights. Dumbiga even received an award from the Americans. So lets amend our security laws and lock them up in Gitmo. If the Americans can do it, why not we follow them? What say you hypocrites?

But just how stupid can the law be? You mean its legal for international terrorists to open their offices here in Malaysia, which they can then use to plan bomb attacks in Indonesia, Phillipines, Thailand, Syria and elsewhere?  Before you know it, Malaysia will become a hub for terrorists planning attacks overseas. 

The Law will never be able to convict them. They can quote the clever Judge Kamardin Hashim who has ruled that it is unconstitutional to try someone for a crime when the crime is to be committed outside the country.

Ya Allah, pasai apa manusia boleh jadi sebegini bodoh atas muka bumi Kamu yang disebut Malaysia ini?  How stupid can we get? 

And all this is happening in the country because our leadership has become weak. When we have weak leadership which cannot do what is right and good for the country, then we are in real deep trouble.

Please also read Tan Sri Zam's blogpost today :  JIKA TIDAK BERKESAN NAJIB AKAN DITELAN OLEH BLUE OCEAN.

Here is Jamal Abdillah explaining what will happen if the nakhoda kurang faham.




PENASIHAT PENASIHAT PENASIHAT NAJIB PATUT DISINGKIRKAN

Tun Daim Zainuddin
TWICE the Finance Minster of Malaysia and now a sought after political commentator, Tun Daim Zainuddin, attributed the Barisan Nasional’s poor showing at the May 5 general polls to incorrect strategy.

He told the China Press newspaper that Malaysia’ general elections is a parliamentary election and not a presidential election, adding that Prime Minister Mohd Najib Abdul Razak’s advisors should be sacked.

“If you associate a vote for BN as a vote for him (Mohd Najib), then BN’s poorer results reflect on him too.

“This is a parliamentary election, not a presidential election. The PM's advisors should be sacked.” he said.

And is Mohd Najib a lame duck Prime Minister and Umno President?

The following is the English transcript of the interview, which covered a wide variety of issues surrounding the outcome of the 13th GE, made available to this blog. I record my appreciation to the China Press for its superb effort and to Tun Daim’s office.

The Day After

1. Tun, what was first in your mind when you first received the full election result? Did you expect it?

I wasn't surprised.  At around 12noon the feedback I got was that - BN 141, DAP 38 butmy own assessment was BN between 125 and 135 only.

2. Do you think this election was a fair one? Opposition parties and NGOs still accused BN of misuse the government facilities, and the problematic integrity of the electoral roll.

Of course it is fair. If its not fair how come in Penang and Selangor Pakatan improved on majorities and Federal BN get only 133. These accusations are not new. They said all these even before the elections. I’ve said earlier that they will be saying all these because they know they can't get to Putrajaya.

Read my interviews before this, I said they will be proclaiming to  the world they would win and that if they don’t its because they have been robbed and therefore entitled to protest, incite people which is what they are doing now and they want people to go to streets. They want FRUs, water cannons and teargas then CNN, Al Jazeera etc will be back and they are back in the news.

Anwar and Kit Siang are inviting police to arrest them. They want to be arrested. They are totally irresponsible. If you see the recent rallies and that majority of the participants are Chinese, what do you think will happen if one hot-headed Malay organisation wants to organise a counter rally? But Anwar and Kit Siang don't mind, if there is another interracial incident, they would blame BN.  If you are willing to sacrifice peace and stability for your ends, what kind of leadership is this?

They say they should be the rightful leaders of this country, yet they defy laws, defy the police, and they have no respect for, and undermine every institutions of government which they say they should helm. What kind of leadership promotes lawlessness and anarchy? What message do you send and what lessons do you teach the young and the impressionable? Leadership comes with responsibility.

There are laws in this country. Go to court, of course, they say courts are not fair, yet these same courts have acquitted Anwar. Again when it’s convenient to them they go to the courts to sue and silence their detractors. They accept where they won and reject where they lost.  They are selective. Karpal practices and appeals before this same Court.

Be brave and honest. Accept the results. Karpal says he is happy with the results. PAS has accepted. Azmin is critical of Anwar’s refusal to accept the results and doing these rallies, but don't read too much into his statements. It’s like an old married couple’s quarrel, one party merajuk (sulks) but in the end they are still together.

Anwar is already up to his tricks - putting out feelers to Barisan MPs. He is waiting after the Cabinet appointments for another round of his Sept 16.

Reasons for Poor BN Performance


3. As expected in our last interview, BN managed to retain Putrajaya but couldn't regain the two-third majority. What are the main reasons?

Really you should ask BN. But in my opinion, it’s the wrong strategy. As I’ve said before, this is a parliamentary election, not a presidential election. The PM's advisors should be sacked. If you associate a vote for BN as a vote for him, then BN poorer results reflects on him too.  I kept reminding them that those huge numbers at BN’s ceramahs do not translate into votes. You don’t try to fight his (Anwar’s) numbers with your even bigger numbers. Let Anwar be the entertainer (borrowing from The Financial Times). We are not entertainers, we don’t know how to sing, dance and tell jokes. It’s a serious business electing a government, so lets leave this clown’s strategy alone and not play to his game.

 If I know, then surely BN knows that the Chinese majority areas were gone. Why waste time and money? As a strategy, you should concentrate on those areas where you lost by slim majorities in 2008 and strengthen the seats you won in 2008. There was also the question of choice of candidates, and for example in Pandan, why be petty?

Many people disputed that there was a Chinese tsunami.  But there was, in the sense that Chinese voters voted en block whilst non-Chinese votes were split; but this is their right. This is democracy.

What was disturbing was the reason for the en block votes. Pakatan preached hatred for BN particularly UMNO. DAP have always told the Chinese that they are victims, marginalised; that the cup they have is always half empty; that this is the time to teach MCA and Gerakan a lesson for being under UMNO’s control, that UMNO (and by extension the Malays) were dominant, and this was a Malay-led government, and the Chinese by voting out all the Chinese parties in BN is saying that they have had enough of being bullied by UMNO/ Malays. If this is not racist, I don’t know what is.

Their cybertroopers were at work, 24 hours a day, sending misinformation, spins, rumours, lies, untruths etc. Where were the Banglas? Where was the blackout? How many peoplewhose ink washed off, voted twice? Tun M flew away in a private jet? Lies and lies and the Chinese believe in "ubah" and "Ini kali lah".

I told you if the Chinese rejected Najib's leadership, the rural votes will swing to BN. DAP benefited the most. PAS, I do not know how it is going to reorganise itself. PKR we know practice nepotism, ask Azmin.

As for the Indian votes, only some Indians votes came back to BN. Koh Tsu Koon has announced his retirement. Chua Soi Lek is not seeking re-election. In the West you lose, you retire. Brown retired. Here they are not morally strong to quit. Anwar stays on, Kit Siang stays on, Hadi stays on. Let me remind you, Anwar said he would retire if he failed to get to Putrajaya. Anwar does not keep to his word. He will never retire, until the day he is on his deathbed he would still want to be PM.

Let’s recognize that nowhere in the world is it easy to get a two-third majority. Urban voters everywhere in the world are anti-government. BN's strength lies in the rural areas. Yet too much time and money were wasted in urban areas where the results were almost certain.

4. Chinese votes for opposition even reached over 90%, why? From your observation, why MCA and Gerakan rejected by the Chinese? We still remember in 2004 the situation was totally different.

I have explained at length in the answer above. Chinese votes for the Pakatan reached 90% because they believed in Pakatan’s propaganda. This is at last the chance to reject the Malay-led BN.  We saw on polling day many Chinese came out in droves believing that Pakatan was going to win. They were all misled. Pakatan knew that they were not going to get the numbers. Imagine Chinese voting for PAS, when they have seen what was happening in Kedah and Kelantan. Chinese voters were taken for a ride that they were going to make the difference. If Hindraf can affect the 2008 results, imagine what the Chinese with their bigger number can do? This was the line given and they swallowed it. In 2004, Chinese gave the then PM with his clean image a chance but that got to BN’s head and 2008 was the result. In 2013, Pakatan tapped into the Chinese and urban psyche. The Chinese are practical people and if they felt that the votes could go either way, they would not take a chance and choose stability over change; but if they believed that they can change the Government and win, then they did what you see in GE13. But Chinese normally bet on minority horse.

5. By analysing the results, we can see DAP won more seats this time and seats won by PKR and PAS also close to their numbers in 2008. Does it mean Malay votes still split? How about Indian votes?

Malay votes split 4 ways. UMNO, PAS, Keadilan and fence sitters. Lucky for BN, this time most went to UMNO. Less than 50% of Indian voters voted BN.

People’s Real Concerns

6. Why the 1Malaysia plans, ETP, transformation plans did not work and caused BN a bigger loss?

I don't think people reject 1Malaysia, ETP etc. The issues were not these. In all my earlier interviews I had listed the rakyat’s concern. These were and still are 1) corruption 2) good governance 3) security 4) education 5) inflation 6) urban poor 7) young graduates. Government instead focused on giving handouts. You give dinner once, people thank you. Give them five times and they think you are trying to buy their votes.

7. Even though you have given your warning, but the so-called Chinese Tsunami was so big to be stopped. But, is it fair to blame the Chinese for BN's not so good victory?

I have explained the Chinese tsunami. Of course, Pakatan have to say it is not Chinese tsunami, otherwise they will be held responsible for this racial divide. Are they denying the Chinese voted en block and Malay votes were split? No one is blaming the Chinese, but this what it is.  As I said they were misled and they voted Pakatan but again it is their right to buy into that argument and voted to kick the BN out.

8. How to change their minds or should BN given up Chinese by promoting the Ketuanan Melayu sprit to rely more on the support of Malays?

You can always try and you must try to change their minds. You cannot give up on nearly 30% of your fellow citizens. But you have to address issues as in my answer to Question 6.

Ketuanan Melayu was when the Malays fought against Malayan Union. Ketuanan Melayu was in the Federation of Malaya Agreement of 1948.  After 1957 and later in 1963, there is constitutional Malaysia. All races have accepted the Constitution. It is a fine and well-balanced document.  Sabah, Sarawak and Singapore too had accepted this document. The Constitution protects all citizens. We are all Malaysians. As I said, I'm born a Malay, you are born a Chinese. We don't chose to be Malay or Chinese, but you and I choose to be Malaysians. That is our choice. If I don't like to be a Malaysian, I can choose to be something else also. So let us stay united and work hard and sincerely and make sure the country continues to prosper in peace.

9. Najib has offered a “reconciliation" plan. How serious is he? In addition, if this plan is necessary, how should Najib deal with it?

I am glad he offered reconciliation. He must be serious. You don't make statements you don't mean. You are a leader. But I read Pakatan has rejected his overtures, they talk about unity but do not practice it. Instead they offer preset conditions.  Are they sincere?  As leaders, the country must come first.

10. How is this so-called process of reconciliation ever going to take place when chauvinists and radicals still there to give their provoking remarks?

We, the rakyat must reject the chauvinists and the radicals. Government must take action against them. Rakyat must show support against these people. Country must come first. Whatever you may think about the Malays, they have shown that they reject extremists. They rejected Perkasa, Ibrahim Ali and Zulkifly Nordin.

Najib A Lame Duck PM?

11. Some people say Najib is a lame duck Prime Minister, he has not only has to think of how to regain the support of non-Malays but has to guard against the wolves in his party. Will he encounter any problem when party election takes place this year?

I have retired. I don't know the mood is in the party. He has to explain to party members what went wrong. Is he going to be a lame duck PM? Cameron in UK, Gilliard in Australia, Mohan Singh in India so far are ok even though in their cases they are ruling on razor thin majority.

UMNO has to remain united if it wants to get the support of Malays. Strengthen your rural support and the rest of the Malays will respect UMNO. If he explains to UMNO what went wrong then I think UMNO will accept and offer their support. It will take a bit of time with the Divisions and he has to make sure they continue to support him and he has to tell UMNO members that only UMNO is their saviour. I believe UMNO members will give him another chance. Those disloyal, you must punish them. But prove with evidence.  You have the Opposition to deal with you don’t need enemies in the blanket.  You don’t need over 3 millions members if they did not work or vote for you. It is better to have a smaller but committed membership who love the party and want what is best of it. For far too long, UMNO has had members who placed self-interest above the party.

12. Please analyse the result for Selangor. Far from what we expected, BN lost more seats and more popular votes this time despite of thousand good efforts had been put?

Selangor was a disaster. When I got feedback on the problems on the ground, I sent many messages to the leadership. I spoke to Zain (Mohd Zain Mohamed, the BN Selangor Election Director). He assured me of victory, totally ignoring the voices on the ground. His own Ketua Pemuda stood against him and so many ketua bahagians campaigned against him.


I think Zain was a wrong  choice. He was dropped from Cabinet by Najib because obviously he didn’t think much of his ability and then you appoint him as Selangor UMNO Secretary. I don't understand Najib’s logic. When you all asked me at the last interview, I said there were problems of wrong candidates. Ketua Bahagians’ were not happy. Among UMNO (members) sabotage was everywhere. I told Zain a list of state seats that were in trouble. Zain said yes a bit of problem but BN would win. In all those seats that were in my list, BN lost. With wrong candidates not going to the ground, ignoring divisional chiefs, not visiting your members and voters, sabotage, you couldn't win.

When I was in Negeri Sembilan campaigning on Friday night, I got a message that Bukit Selambau state seat under the Merbok Parlimentary seat was in trouble.  I got back to KL at 2 am and a few hours later, early on Saturday morning, I flew to Kedah. They were still quarrelling about the state candidate, even when it’s one day before polling. I told them they were crazy. Just vote BN. Told them they had half a day left to campaign and go together and campaign and be seen to be united. They lost by 500 votes because they closed their pondok panas by 4pm, confident that they had won. I smsed you by noon that BN won Merbok but the Indians there have to quarrel even at the last minute about candidates and we lost. We are our own worst enemies.

13. As well as in Penang. Before 5 May, BN seemed to have some hope as the 1Malaysia welfare group had organized many free dinners around Penang and free concert. They tried to attract the voters with money and presents. But, all effort proved useless. Why?

These people are amateurs. They are silly people. They think they are clever and throw money around. Better give to charity. Why BN allowed stupid events like these? People are insulted because they knew you thought they could be bought with money, concerts and dinners.  So they came to relax, have free makan and  be entertained. This is an election. It’s a serious matter. Let Anwar be the entertainer.


(China Press)

Thursday, 23 May 2013

CINA PULAUKAN PIMPINAN MELAYU, MELAYU PULAUKAN BARANGAN CINA.SALAHKAH?


Apabila orang Melayu berpakat untuk memulaukan kedai Cina, barangan Cina dan semua produk syarikat  Cina, maka akhbar The Star menjalankan kempen menentangnya kerana dakwanya membahayakan keharmonian sosial negara.

Tetapi apabila orang Cina menjalankan kempen untuk meruntuhkan dominan Melayu dalam sebuah kerajaan majmuk yang terbina sejak merdeka, The Star tidak pula nampak bahayanya.

Saya telah nampak bahayanya apabila ribuan orang Cina di kampong dan di bandar beratur panjang berbatu-batu, termasuk yang pulang dari luar negara untuk menenggelamkan kerajaan Melayu pada 5 Mei lalu.

Tindakan Buy Chinese Last oleh beberapa NGO Melayu adalah sebagai membalas tindakan orang Cina khususnya DAP yang mahu menghancurkan sebuah kerajaan yang bersifat multiracial tetapi telah tersasar  membina  sebuah kerajaan Bumiputra. 

Jika orang Cina mahu melindungi perbuatan jahat menentang kepimpinan Melayu dengan kempen "Kami Suka Najib, Tetapi Tidak Suka BN," maka apa salahnya jika orang Melayu berkempen "Kami Suka Cina, Tetapi Tak Suka Barangan Cina."

Saya sendiri tidak percaya bahawa tindakan ini akan berkesan serta merta kerana kuasa ekonomi tidak sepenuhnya berada di tangan orang Melayu atau Bumiputra tetapi kempen Buy Chinese Last boleh berkesan jika dijalankan terus menerus  dalam masa empat lima tahun akan datang secara profesional dengan strategi yang inovatif dan kreatif, halus dan bijak secara kecil-kecilan dan besar-besaran.

Kerajaan mesti banyakan lagi Kedai1Malaysia di seluruh negara.

Ini bukan tindakan rasis kerana kempen jatuhkan kerajaan Melayu juga bukan rasis. Hanya Ketua Pengarang Akhbar The Star, Datuk Wong Chun Wai sahaja nampak rasis seperti dia nampak Utusan Malaysia rasis, tetapi tidak nampak akhbar Cina rasis.

Mulakan dengan pemulauan akhbar The Star.

KENAPA THE STAR BERSIKAP BEGINI?

Akhbar The Star yang menonjolkan diri sebagai juara untuk mengharmonikan semula hubungan antara kaum selepas Pilihan Raya Umum Ke13, tetapi tidak langsung menyiarkan  berita mengenai Pas tidak bersetuju dengan perhimpunan haram untuk menjatuhkan kerajaan yang dijuarai oleh Lim Kit Siang dan Anwar Ibrahim.

Jika The Star ikhlas untuk mendamaikan negara, maka berita ini akan memberikan sumbangan yang besar ke arah melemahkan masyarkat Cina yang sedang berada dalam uphoria gerakan untuk menjatuhkan kerajaan dengan keganasan dan kekerasan yang diwarisi dari  PKM.

Mereka ini sebenarnya adalah communist surrogate. Nasib baik The Star gagal dalam usaha untuk membawa balik Chin Peng ke Malaysia. Jika tidak, dia tentunya memberikan inspirasi dan semangat besar kepada orang Cina Malaysia dari dekat.

The Star juga tidak menyiarkan berita orang Cina Malaysia di London mengadakan tunjuk perasaan untuk mencemarkan Pilihan Raya Ke 13 di Malaysia dan demikian juga pelajar-pelajar Malaysia menterbalikkan bendera Malaysia di Taiwan.

Apa yang disiarkan hanya bila pelajar-pelajar yang kurang ajar ini mempertahankan diri mereka. 

Zamkata akan menyiarkan dari semasa ke semasa betapa kelicinan The Star menjadi duri dalam daging untuk membuka mata seluruh rakyat yang prihatin terhadap keselamatan negara ini.

Saya kira masa telah berakhir untuk The Star bermuka-muka dan bermain silap mata, pepat di luar rencong di dalam.

KERA SUMBANG PAS DALAM HIMPUNAN HARAM DI KEDAH.

Sekalipun sebahagian besar pemimpin pemimpin Pas tidak bersetuju dengan perhimpunan haram yang dijuarai oleh Anwar  dan Lim Kit Siang tetapi Naib Presiden  Pas Sallehuddin Ayob dan Pesuruhjaya Pas Kedah Mahfuz Omar telah bersama dengan Anwar Ibrahim dalam tunjuk perasaan haram di Ibu Pejabat Pas di Kota Sarang Semut Kedah malam kelmarin.

Sejumlah besar yang hadhir adalah dari kaum Cina.

Kepada Mahfuz dan Sallehuddin tidak ada jalan lain lagi kecuali terus  bersama dengan Anwar Ibrahim sehingga kesaat terakhir kerana kedudukan masa depan mereka dalam kepimpinan Pas juga hanya menghetong hari. Seperti Hadi mereka jug adalah kera sumbang dalam Pas sekarang ini.

Wednesday, 22 May 2013

WHO IS THE BIGGEST GIVER OF BRIBE IN MALAYSIA?

When someone is very loud in opposing corruption, the perception by many is that the person is clean of corrupt practices and such is the perception of the public towards a media which has been vociferous in exposing the abuse by the government and corruption by political leaders.
 For that, newspapers in Malaysia are willing to sacrifice the lives of thousands of people to cover the dangers of flying with the most unsafe airline in Malaysia.

Newspapers in Malaysia are also the recipients of bribe to cover the weaknesses of big companies. How? (An article on the corruption by Air Asia to the print media will follow suit).

This is also done by the Chinese newspapers to cover the antics of the Chinese, the biggest giver of bribes to the Malays.

Since the government of the day is supported by the Malays, the Malay Rulers, a Malay Prime Minister, a Malay KPN (IGP), a Malay KSN (Chief Secretary to the Government) and other Malay power, hence the general perception, especially the non-Malays, the recipients of bribes are Malays.

I believe 99 % of those who give bribes are Chinese, but they do not tell what they get, facilities they get to enjoy, property and millions in monetary gain.

Not many Chinese become rich through an honest way, but because of their wit in giving bribes, to cheat, abuse, etc. The Chinese who are honest remain poor.

When there is competition among them for government contracts, the one who fail will make false accusations to indicate that the evil one is the Malays or Bumiputera, like they did to Sarawak Chief Minister Tan Sri Taib Mahmud.

When an aide of a Chinese politician committed suicide as he could no longer cover-up for his boss being investigated by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Agency (MACC), it is the MACC which is accused of murdering him and the case made a racial issue.

When a senior Customs officer was murdered for being firm and wanting to uphold a clean government, DAP did not say anything good about the officer, as it did in criticizing the MACC officers and making a conclusion that the aide was not in the wrong, although investigation was not over.

Why didn’t they come to a conclusion that the officer died because of his refusal to accept bribes from the Chinese?

This is the prejudice politics of the DAP.


THE STAR CHIEF EDITOR CONTINUES WITH HIS POLITICAL MISSION

The Star
 newspaper today (May 21 ) reported on a claim by PKR strategic director Rafizi Ramli that eight people were not able to vote in the May 5 general election because other people had voted on their behalf.
Is The Star being professional about this?

Does it not cross The Star’s mind that anybody could make such an allegation.  UMNO or MCA can also find someone to make such a claim. Why is The Star so quick in believing a baseless report and straight away report about it.

Even a non-journalist could see the weakness in the news. Is The Star blind?

Since the report is by a Malay, The Star should not belittled the ability of the Malays to see this as a racial ploy aimed at eroding the confidence of the Chinese in the Election Commission (EC), one of the institutions aimed by DAP.

Certainly, The Star  is aware that in current situation, if such a report is made by UMNO or MCA, no one will believe, but whatever lies by the opposition, Lim Kit Siang and Anwar Ibrahim, it will be accepted without any question.

And in this case, the contribution by The Star is huge.

The Star is not making efforts to help restore the people’s confidence in the government which has been elected according to the law, but using the power of its news to assist the opposition to create doubts among the people for all the government’s institutions.

And he is trying to belittle Datuk Seri Najib by using the shadow play to promote efforts to restore confidence and unity.

KHAIRY ! JANGAN BIARKAN KALIMULLAH MEROSAKAN MASA DEPAN ANDA

CEO Air Asia, Azran Osman Rani mempunyai hobi luar biasa yang terbukti dari
gambar-gambar ini dan kiri di bawah Kalimullah Hassan, wartawan, jutawan dan
hartawan.
Seorang wartawan yang bertukar menjadi jutawan dan hartawan, tiba-tiba menjadi berani menampilkan diri untuk turut mengkeritik Utusan Melayu (Utusan Malaysia) suara UMNO dan institusi teragung perjuangan Melayu(Lihat Nasionalisme Melayu oleh Prof.William R.Roff) , demi untuk membela Ketua Pegawai Eksekutif Air Asia X Azran Osman Rani yang meluat dengan Utusan Malaysia kerana bersikap rasis.

Azran telah mengugut akan menggunakan kuasanya menarik balik iklan Air Asia di Utusan Malaysia yang didakwanya bersikap rasis tetapi telah dipertahankan oleh Mantan Menteri Rafidah Aziz sebagai pandangan peribadi..

Inilah  bekas menteri yang walaupun telah kayaraya tetapi  lebih mementingkan penerbangan percuma dari harapan rakyat yang diletakan kebahunya bila menjadi Penegerui Air Asia..

Orang Melayu jangan hairan, jika budi Tun Dr. Mahathir kepadanya pun boleh dilupakan, inikan pula Utusan Melayu yang sekadarkan  memberikan ruang kepadanya untuk menulis seminggu sekali di Mingguan Malaysia bagi mempromokan dirinya semasa dia masih jadi pensyarah UM.

Melihat sikap bekas menteri ini, menggalakan Kalimullah untuk  menyatakan kebanggaan kerana  ' rakyat bersatu mengutuk Utusan Malaysia sebagai rasis."

Tuan Kalimullah saya ingin bertanya rakyat yang mana? jutawan jutawan Cina yang menjadi rakan karib tuan atau rakyat yang menyokong DAP dan Parti Keadilan atau rakyat jati yang menyokong calon-calon UMNO yang memenangi 88 kerusi Parlimen.

Sebenarnya Kalimullah  sendiri tidak pasti dan bertanya "Kadang-kadang saya tertanya-tanya dari bawah batu mana beberpa personaliti Utusan ini keluar. Mesti dari tempat yang betul betul gelap.

 (I wonder sometimes under which rock some of these Utusan personalities crawled from. Must be real sank dark place).

Memanglah benar mereka ini dari ceruk ulu, rakyat murhin yang miskin, orang kampong yang bodoh dan taksub yang tidak pandai menjadi sumber maklumat golongan anti kerajaan atau agen kepada negara jiran untuk mencari wang.

Mereka adalah dari keturunan rakyat asal negara ini dan bukannya dari keturunan bangsat yang tiba-tiba lupa daratan kerana menemui kekayaan.

Mereka tidak termasuk dalam golongan yang telah dijangkakan oleh mendiang Tan Sri C.C. Too, Ketua Perang Saraf Malaya dan Malaysia (1956-83), bahawa  menerusi penyusupan dan subversion dengan bantuan communist surrogates akan mencetuskan "suasana revolusi baru" yang akan dipercepatkan dan ditingkatkan oleh sebarang recesi ekonomi.

CPM was merely temporarily suspending its armed struggle but through infiltration and subversion with help communist surrogates would creat a new revolutionary situation which would be expedited and agravated by any future economic recession( Lihat The Communist Party Of Malaya by Aloysius Chin halaman 248.

Kalimullah telah memainkan peranan dalam usaha mendekatkan UMNO dengan anasir-anasir revolusi ini, setelah ketuanya dibebaskan dari tahanan dengan Khairy Jamaluddin menjadi sebagai jambatan, tetapi telah digagalkan oleh kebangkitan nasionalisme dan patriotisme Melayu dan UMNO.

Tetapi Kalimullah tidak putus asa dan berusaha sehingga saat terakhir untuk menggagalkan kemaraan Datuk Seri Najib menuju ke Perdana Menteri dengan berlindung di sebalik Malaysian Insider. Untuk seketika, dia menyembunyikan kukunya  menunggu musuh lemah.  

Tetapi tiba-tiba dia tampil ke hadapan, apabila sahaja sahabat karibnya Khairy Jamaluddin menjadi menteri kabinet, memperlihatkan kepakarannya mencakar dan cakaran ini jika terlalu angkuh akan merosakan masa depan Khairy.

Konspirasinya dengan Khairy Jamaluddin diketahui umum dan demikian juga dalam percubaan untuk menyekat  Datuk Seri Najib ke kedudukan No 1. Ketika dia berada dipuncak kuasa NST, dia mengarahkan akhbar itu ke arah memburukan Tun Dr. Mahathir dan menidakkan semua jasanya.

Sebagai seorang rasis yang anti Melayu, dia tidak merasakan perbuatannya itu adalah menghina  rakyat Malaysia  yang menyanjung dan memuja Dr. Mahathir sebagai penebus maruah bangsa dan dan pemahkotaan nama negara di seluruh dunia.

Kalimullah tidak dapat melihat di luar kotak rasismenya. Apabila orang Melayu dan Islam melihatnya sebagai tidak menghormati kedaulatan agama Islam dan juga tidak menghromati orang Melayu ketika dia mempersendakan Nabi Muhammad dengan siaran gambar kartun Nabi berkali-kali, walaupun dibantah oleh umat Islam (Mukhriz tentu masih ingat), maka dia merasakan ketika itu sebagai juara liberalisme dan pluralisme agama di Malaysia dia merasa selamat kerana berlindung di bawah ketiak Khairy.

Kalimullah mempunyai sikap anti semuanya yang bersifat Melayu. Kalimullah tidak sedar apabila dia tidak senangi oleh majoriti besar rakyat Malaysia dan hanya diberikan tepukan  oleh sebahagian kecil  bukan Melayu, maka dia adalah rasis.

Kebencian bangsa Melayu kepadanya menunjukkan bahawa dia rasis.

Tidak semesti seseorang itu tidak rasis, bila dia menjadi popular hanya kepada bukan Melayu yang merupakan golongan kecil.

Adalah lebih baik bagi Khairy memisahkan diri dari seorang yang rasis seperti ini, kerana sebarang hubungan dengannya akan menyebabkannya terpalit, akan  membuka kembali pekong luka lama yang akan memburukan masa depannya. Bahawa Kalimullah menyerang Utusan Melayu dilihat oleh rakyat, pemerhati-pemerhati politik  khususnya; orang Melayu  sebagai menumpang kekuatan Khairy. 

Masa depan Khairy bukan berada di tangan Kalimullah, tetapi di tangan UMNO dan ditangan rakyat Malaysia. Jika dia tidak berhati-hati maka peluang menjadi Perdana Menteri di hari muka akan musnah.

Pada peringkat ini, Khairy harus memilih antara Utusan Malaysia, Kalimullah atau Air Asia. Seorang Ketua Pemuda mesti berani untuk mempertahankan warisan suara keramat bangsa Malaysia yang  keagungannya tercatit dalam lipatan sejarah negara. (Untuk mengetahui lebih lanjut bacalah buku saya yang baru diterbitkan: Kisah Sejarah Utusan Melayu Didepan Api Di Belakang Duri. Terjual di MPH dan lain-lain kedai buku di seluruh negara. Bahasa Inggerisnya sedang diterjemahkan oleh Wan Hulaimi wartawan bebas di London yang menterjemahkan buku saya Mahathir Di Sebalik Tabir )