Saturday, 21 September 2013

SEBAB MUKHRIIZ BOLEH MENANG DARI PANDANGAN PROF RAMLAH ADAM.


DARI THE  STAR ONLIE
Published: Saturday September 21, 2013 MYT 8:30:00 AM
Updated: Friday September 20, 2013 MYT 10:47:21 PM

Mukhriz's winning factor

Datuk Seri Mukhriz Mahathir (right) with his father Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad.
Datuk Seri Mukhriz Mahathir (right) with his father Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad.
   
Email
Facebook
0
PETALING JAYA: Despite being born as a child of one of the most-renowned political figures in the country, Datuk Mukhriz Mahathir rise in Umno is based on his own merit, and not because of his father's influence.
"He can't run away from the fact that he is the son of (former Prime Minister) Tun Mahathir Mohamad and he gained people's respect because of that - but they are two different personalities," Umno expert Datuk Prof Dr Ramlah Adam told The Star Online.
Ramlah, who is also a political analyst from Universiti Teknologi Mara, said Mukhriz, 49, will make a great impact in Umno if he is elected as one of its vice presidents in the upcoming party election on Oct 19.
"Although he is still considered young in politics, he already has the authority in (policy decision-making at state level) and people perceive him as educated and professional.
"These are the traits that Umno should highly seek for, as it can open up the floodgates of young politicians to become the next in line in Umno before the next general election," she said.
Mukhriz went against the odds when he announced his candidacy as an Umno vice-president Thursday, facing veterans such as former Malacca chief minister Tan Sri Ali Rustam and former Negri Sembilan Mentri Besar Tan Sri Isa Samad.
The youngest among the pack, he also will be up against incumbent Umno vice-presidents, Datuk Seri Zahid Hamidi, Datuk Seri Shafie Apdal and Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Hussein.
The trio has also formed a pact to work together to defend their positions at the polls.
When asked whether Mukhriz was aligned to Ali and Isa to unseat the incumbents, another political analyst Datuk Prof Zainal Kling said the situation was unlikely.
"The new faces are fighting individually to displace any of the incumbents, that is all," said Zainal, who is also a political analyst from Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
All three incumbents, he said, are working hard to gain momentum on the ground and he said it is still not clear who would fall as each has a fair chance winning.
"However, the weakest link would probably be Shafie, because he does not really stand out compared to the rest.
"But you never know, he might make it through because there are delegates who want a representative from East Malaysia," said Zainal.
He also said although Mukhriz had the advantage of being the son of a former premier, he has yet to prove his capabilities in both Kedah and Umno.

"Being a son to Mahathir could be a winning factor, and he could win some votes from delegates from his age range.
"I still don't foresee any changes at the top leadership. I think Hishammuddin, Shafie and Zahid will remain as vice-presidents," he said.
Ramlah, however, had a different take, despite arguments suggesting that Mukhriz was not politically mature to make it through.
"Mukhriz has every advantage to win because now he is a leader from Kedah, a state which holds strongly to the principles of Islam and he has the backing from the people," she said.
She also compared Mukhriz's political influence compared to Isa and Ali, whom she said no longer have the authority in policy decision-making at the state or the federal level.
"Although Ali is the chairman of Malacca Economic Consultative Council and Isa is a Felda chairman, they are not policy makers, unlike Mukhriz," she said.
"I think it is time we give opportunity for young blood to rise up rather than maintain the old faces," she added.

8 comments:

  1. The incumbents are going to simply inform the delegates that there is an overambitious upstart trying to jump queqe claiming that he, and he alone can transform UMNO.

    Malay tradition and culture dictates that patience and respect for elders are highly valued qualities as opposed to that of impatience and greed for power. Characteristics imbued in the Hang Tuah lore.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jebat is a better choice. Changes could only be achieved through young and `clean` politicians to take this nation forward and not the `old bagages` with many tainted deeds.

      Delete
  2. Tuah is so yesteryears lor. zaman tok kadok dah .

    drmuz

    ReplyDelete
  3. I am generation Y. Since the first time i heard the hangtuah story, i sided with Jebat coz i think he had more gumption. Berani Berubah ! Hidup Melayu !

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jebat sangat bersalah kerana membunuh ramai orang yg tidak bersalah. Jebat nengikut emosi dan bersyaitan dihati.Matlamat tidak menghalalkan cara. Kalu semua gen y spr kamu, rosak bangsa, binasa negara. Jangan perasan hebat sbg gen y. Jangan angkuh.

      Delete
  4. Jebat angkuh dan bongkak. Dia merasakan tiada sesiapa dapat membunuhnya selepas ketiadaan Tuah.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Memang Melayu itu bangsanya penuh beradat, yg tua lagi di hormati yg muda di kasihi. Hari ini bangsa melayu kehidupanya penuh kemelut dan kejumudan lagi segala macam ancaman pengkhianatan! Apakah cubaan menongkah arus Mukhriz dianggap cantasan jika pada masa yg sama Bangsanya dahagakan pembaharuan rentetan terlalu bergantung pd Muka lama. Apa biadapkah dia sehingga terpaksa menunggu Ayahandanya berundur, lalu di gagahkan jenteranya berkempen membadai kepercayaan umum sehingga gagah jua ke persada MB. Ya kaduk akui kapal itu berwajah Mahathir tetapi apakah kapal shj penentu jaya tanpa persona sang Nakhoda. Mukhriz memiliki kualiti Bangsanya yg di belakangnya berdiri dia seorang negarawan ulung si Ayah. Apakah itu masih dianggap mentah sedang usia dan pengalaman nya jika diukur melepasi separuh umur kematangan Nabi junjunganNya..

    ReplyDelete
  6. jebat dan tuah.... hmm macam kalau mat saleh citer robinhood... untuk kebenaran buat salah.... hmm... yang bestnye citer pasal halal haram untuk zaman hangtuah dan hang jebat, dimana halal haram dulu yang masih ramai tak kenal (siap bersihir2/ilmu kebal)..... tapi takde beza gak zaman sekarang... halal haram camtu jugak, still lagi jumpa melayu islam kat kelab2 malam... minum arak... isap dadah... kalau nak pilih jebat atau tuah tu entahla... korang rasa patut ke korang belah mana2 pihak? tapi bagi aku... jikalau pilih tuah akan meneruskan kekejaman raja, dan pilih jebat akan terkorbannya nyawa2 yang tak bersalah... aku pilih jebat kot... at least raja tu mungkin mati ditangan jebat.... dan tidak melahirkan lagi darah2 keturunan yang mana mungkin ikuti jejak langkah nenek moyang dia.... so kalau by jebat, sacrifice a lot pada masa singkat... tapi menguntungkan untuk jangka panjang.... amacam?

    ReplyDelete